Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
MCKAY v. USA
as 2:2023cv02024
Petitioner:
OMALI MCKAY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
DAVIS v. DOE et al
as 2:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DAVIS
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE 1-9, LINDA ROSENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKAY v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2022cv01091
Petitioner:
OMALI MCKAY
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT ERIC ARMEL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. SCHWARTZ et al
as 2:2021cv00659
Defendant:
MS WARDEN BRYAN L. KLINE, LIEUTENANT BRAD TOMASELLO, COUNSELOR CORY SNYDER and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JOSEPH HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
FRNDAK et al v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2020cv01411
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, JOHN DOE, LIBERTY BAIL BONDS INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH FRNDAK and DIANE FRNDAK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAY v. A.O. SMITH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2019cv01311
Defendant:
POWERMASTER PACIFIC PRODUCTS, ZURN INDUSTRIES, FLUOR CONSTRUCTORS INTERNATIONAL and others
Plaintiff:
CARL E. GAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MCKAY et al v. MCKAY et al
as 2:2016cv00569
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE MCKAY and BRIDGET A. HENSEL
Defendant:
ANTHONY MCKAY, DAVID SISAK , PETER BECHTOLD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BOBBERT v. MCKAY et al
as 1:2015cv00105
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L. BOBBERT
Defendant:
JEFFERY MCKAY, DEAN SLICER, LAURA EATON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANG v. DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE et al
as 2:2015cv00128
Plaintiff:
ROBERT S. LANG
Defendant:
DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE, CHUCK HAGEL, DEBORAH LEE JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
