Cases 1 - 10 of 20
SERFASS v. JAMES et al
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
JAMES SERFASS
Defendant:
CASEY JAMES, DEANNA DELLATORRED, PATRICK NAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
KOUGH v. TRAMARKI et al
as 3:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL LEE KOUGH, JR.
Defendant:
TRAMARKI, NAGLE and PRIME CARE MEDICAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CHESHER et al v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2022cv01822
Plaintiff:
SHANE CHESTER, JOANNE M. KING, ANDREW NOSBISCH and others
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY, RICH FITZGERALD, LAURA ZASPEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALEXANDER v. THORNLEY et al
as 3:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
KEITH ALEXANDER
Defendant:
CASEY THORNLEY, PATRICK NAGLE, DEANNA DELLATORRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
NAGLE et al v. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
as 2:2021cv00261
Plaintiff:
TIANA GENSER and BEN NAGLE
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GAY v. A.O. SMITH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2019cv01311
Defendant:
POWERMASTER PACIFIC PRODUCTS, ZURN INDUSTRIES, FLUOR CONSTRUCTORS INTERNATIONAL and others
Plaintiff:
CARL E. GAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
AINA V. PA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, et al
as 3:2019cv00162
Defendant:
CRNP RICHARD CLARK, CRNP PATRICK NAGLE, PA-C CASEY THORNLEY and others
Plaintiff:
ANDRE YANICK AINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SASSE v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2019cv00130
Defendant:
PATRICK NAGLE, REBECCA REIFER, JOHN WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
CHAD ALLEN SASSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WILLIAMS v. NAJI et al
as 3:2018cv00110
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DR. MUHAMMED NAJI, JANET PEARSON, PATRICK NAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
