Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
HAYNES v. S.C.I. HOUTZDALE, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv00165
Plaintiff: DONALD R. HAYNES
Defendant: S.C.I. HOUTZDALE, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, DR. NAJI MUHAMMAD, TERRI SECHRENGOST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MOSLEY v. IRWIN et al.
as 1:2023cv00133
Plaintiff: KAREEM MOSLEY
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT R. IRWIN, DEPUTY E. MONGELLUZO, DEPUTY M. BLICHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
EASLEY v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00251
Plaintiff: WARREN EASLEY
Defendant: JOHN WETZEL, OBERLANDER, SARATELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WOOLEY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv01669
Defendant: BNURSE JANE DOE 2, NURSE JANE DOE 3, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Plaintiff: THADDIUS WOOLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES v. SAUERS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00069
Plaintiff: PARIS L. JAMES
Defendant: DEBRA SAUERS, ERIC TICE, MICHAEL OVERMYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDSON v. CRAWFORD COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00275
Plaintiff: GARY L. RICHARDSON
Defendant: CRAWFORD COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, TIM L. LEWIS, KENNETH SAULSBERY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACOBS v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00470
Plaintiff: ANDRE JACOBS
Defendant: CITY OF PITTSBURGH, ALLEGHENY COUNTY BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS, PITTSBURGH POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
OSTEEN v. WARDEN RUSTIN et al
as 2:2007cv00035
Defendant: ALLEGHENY COUNTY HEALTH DEPT. & DIRECTOR DR. BRUCE DIXON, HEAD NURSE JANE DOE, WARDEN RUSTIN and others
Plaintiff: PATRICIA L. OSTEEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?