Cases 51 - 60 of 173
Marable v. Jacob et al
as 1:2020cv01284
Defendant:
Jacob and McHerrin River Regional Jail
Plaintiff:
William Irvin Marable, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marable, Jr. v. Lt Jacob, et al
as 1:2020cv01114
Defendant:
Lucy, J. Alexander, Lt. Jacob and others
Plaintiff:
William Irvin Marable, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yahweh v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2020cv01105
Plaintiff:
Yeshua Emanuel Yahweh, Robert Gabriel Love, Gabriel Alexander Antonio and others
Defendant:
Ms. Ansah, Foe Two, Carl K. Kester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01059
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jacob v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00564
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Tracey Hoover Jacob
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Patterson v. Jacobs et al
as 1:2020cv00798
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Patterson
Defendant:
Doris Jacobs and Ernest Bower
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla v. Southside Regional Jail
as 1:2020cv00571
Defendant:
Southside Regional Jail
Plaintiff:
Jacob Angelo Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alley et al v. Quality Eco Technologies, LLC
as 3:2020cv00355
Plaintiff:
Paul Atkinson, Jacob Alley and Christian Bratton
Defendant:
Quality Eco Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
JACOBS v. U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE THREE UNKNOWN NAMED DEPUTIES et al
as 3:2020cv00293
Defendant:
Orange County Jail Unknown Named Staff, Piedmont Regional Jail Unknown Name And Number Of Staff And Warden, Well Path Medical Services Of Piedmont Regional Jail And Unknown Name Supervisor and others
Plaintiff:
Cory Lee Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
