Cases 101 - 110 of 938
Jones v. City National Bank of West Virginia et al
as 1:2021cv00519
Plaintiff:
Grover C. Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
City National Bank of West Virginia, Shelby Crouse and Others to be Named
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burgess v. City of Huntington et al
as 3:2021cv00582
Plaintiff:
Rocky Eugene Burgess
Defendant:
City of Huntington, Dakota Dishman, Officer Lawhon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayo v. City of Huntington et al
as 3:2021cv00471
Plaintiff:
Emma Mayo
Defendant:
City of Huntington and Richard Kern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. City of Gauley Bridge et al
as 2:2021cv00491
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
The City of Gauley Bridge and Larry Allen Clay, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillon v. Hall et al
as 3:2021cv00435
Plaintiff:
Mason Dillon
Defendant:
Brian D. Hall, Xerxes Rahmati, Scott A. Lowther and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Culbertson v. Godfrey et al
as 2:2021cv00532
Plaintiff:
Thomas Culbertson
Defendant:
Christopher Godfrey and U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Hersom et al v. Crouch et al
as 2:2021cv00450
Plaintiff:
Xavier Hersom and John Doe
Defendant:
Bill J. Crouch, Ayne Amjad and Matthew Wickert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Deavers v. Martin et al
as 2:2021cv00423
Plaintiff:
Amy Deavers
Defendant:
Joshua Martin, Kanawha County Commission, Scott Lowther and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinn v. Zerkle et al
as 2:2021cv00421
Plaintiff:
Taylor Quinn
Defendant:
Lt. Christopher K. Zerkle, Sgt. Paxton Lively, Sgt. Rick Keglor and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Mark Toon and Eric Toon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elswick v. Hall et al
as 3:2021cv00468
Plaintiff:
Dustin Elswick
Defendant:
Brian D. Hall, Xerxes Rahmati, Scott A. Lowther and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
