Cases 41 - 50 of 503
Kokolis v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00654
Petitioner:
Maria Kokolis
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Outlaw v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00649
Petitioner:
Shanay Outlaw
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Whipple v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023cv00645
Petitioner:
Robert Z. Whipple, III
Respondent:
Warden Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Curtis v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00618
Petitioner:
Leslie Erin Curtis
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Laurian-Matuz v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00607
Petitioner:
Pedro L. Laurian-Matuz
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Whitted v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00605
Petitioner:
Jamaica Dajuan Whitted
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brown v. Holzapfel et al
as 5:2023cv00606
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Brown
Defendant:
Warden W. Holzapfel, Dr. Edwards, Associate Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00602
Petitioner:
Aabrial L. Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Carpenter v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00600
Petitioner:
Stephanie L. Carpenter
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Steelman v. Warden
as 5:2023cv00599
Petitioner:
Robert Keith Steelman
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
