Cases 11 - 20 of 39
United States of America v. Guillen (Jimenez)
as 20-311
Defendant:
Gabriel Carrion, AKA Gaby, Jhoan Pichardo, AKA Flaco, Moises Suero and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Edward Jimenez, AKA Buzzy
United States of America v. Guillen (Vasquez)
as 19-1840
Defendant:
Gabriel Carrion, AKA Gaby, Jhoan Pichardo, AKA Flaco, Moises Suero and others
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Matthew Vasquez, Cabeza
Rodriguez v. Alvarez
as 8:2019cv01552
Plaintiff:
Elmer Rafael Rodriguez
Defendant:
Keisi Yuliza Zambrano Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Guillen (Ramirez)
as 19-764
Defendant:
Gabriel Carrion, AKA Gaby, Jhoan Pichardo, AKA Flaco, Moises Suero and others
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Zoraida Ramirez
Nelson Rodriguez v. Florida Department of Corr.
as 19-10742
Petitioner / Appellant:
NELSON RAFAEL RODRIGUEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
United States of America v. Adams (Younge)
as 17-2006
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sergeant Michael Adams, AKA Big Man, AKA Bowser, Erroldo Weatherly, AKA Junior, AKA Dapper, Tyrone Browne, AKA "T" and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Eglan Younge
Rafael Rodriguez v. Los Angeles Superior Court
as 2:2017cv03673
Respondent:
Los Angeles Superior Court
Petitioner:
Rafael Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US v. Rodriguez-Rivera
as 17-1179
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
RAFAEL RODRIGUEZ-RIVERA
US v. Rodriguez-Rivera
as 17-1171
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
RAFAEL RODRIGUEZ-RIVERA
Edwards v. General Motors, LLC
as NYS/1:14-cv-06924
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ishmail Sesay , Dolly Matthews , Dawn Wright and others
Respondent:
King & Spalding LLP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
