Cases 51 - 60 of 862
USA v. Satia Curry
as 22-6096
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SATIA CURRY
US v. Clifton Currie
as 22-4718
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CLIFTON DELWAYN CURRIE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Adonis Real et al v. Yuga Labs, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv08909
Plaintiff:
Adonis Real and Adam Titcher
Defendant:
Yuga Labs, Inc., Wylie Aronow, Greg Solano and others
Petitioner:
Daniel Wolfford, Johnny Johnson, Ezra Boekweg and others
Innovative Sports Management Incorporated v. Ghuman et al
as 2:2022cv02018
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management Incorporated doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Sukhi Singh Ghuman individually doing business as Union Jack, Kevin Currie Johnston individually doing business as Union Jack, Manjinder Singh individually doing business as Union Jack and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Communications Act of 1934
US v. Freddie Curry
as 22-7324
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FREDDIE LEE CURRY, a/k/a King of da Hood, a/k/a Rat
Garrison v. Bankman-Fried et al
as FLS/1:22-CV-23753
Plaintiff:
Garrison and Edwin Garrison
Defendant:
Bankman-Fried, Sam Bankman-Fried, Thomas Brady and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Gregg Podalsky, Skyler Lindeen, Alexander Chernyavsky and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Caroline Ellison, Sam Trabucco, Gary Wang and others
USA v. Curry
as 22-11084
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Paul Curry, Jr.
Curry et al v. Mrs. Fields Gifts
as 2:2022cv00651
Plaintiff:
Jim Curry, Kishona Smith, Autumn Morgan and others
Defendant:
Mrs. Fields Gifts
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0052 Federal Trade Commission Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.