Cases 51 - 60 of 210
MRM Imaging Company v. Bazo et al
as 2:2020cv10317
Defendant:
Esssential Image & Design, Inc. d/b/a Bazo Construction, Bazo Imaging & Construction, Bazo Construction, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
MRM Imaging Company
Counter Defendant:
Mohamad Yousef and Mustapha Missilmani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Katz et al v. Ali et al
as 1:2020cv10089
Defendant:
iRobot Corporation, Mohamad Ali, Ruey-Bin Kao and others
Plaintiff:
David Katz and Thomas Wightman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 j
Mohamad King v. Tatitlek Support Services, Inc, et al
as 20-55029
Defendant / Appellee:
GEONORTH, LLC and TATITLEK SUPPORT SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOHAMAD KING
Katz et al v. Ali et al
as 1:2019cv11692
Defendant:
Mohamad Ali, Ruey-Bin Kao, Deborah Ellinger and others
Nominal Defendant:
iRobot Corporation
Plaintiff:
David Katz and Thomas Wightman
USA v. Said Rahim
as 19-11341
Defendant / Appellant:
SAID AZZAM MOHAMAD RAHIM
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Mohamad Shnewer
as 19-3626
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: MOHAMAD IBRAHIM SHNEWER
FADAVI et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2019cv03396
Defendant:
MICHAEL POMPEO, U.S. CONSULATE, ANKARA, TURKEY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Plaintiff:
SEYEDMOSTAFA JAFARZADEHFADAKI, ANAHITA GHORBANI TAJANI, NILOOFAR FADAVI and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
COOMBS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2019cv03363
Plaintiff:
VERONICA DUSTIN, IBTISAM FARRAN, VICTORIA PITTS and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01400
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Randolph v. Ali et al
as 1:2019cv12212
Defendant:
Anthony Folger, Mohamad S. Ali, Linda Connly and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Randolph
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
