Other Statutes Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 91
State of Oregon et al v. Azar et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2019cv00317
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant: Alex M. Azar, II, Diane Foley, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Oregon Medical Association, Planned Parenthood of Southwestern Oregon, American Medical Association and others
Amicus Curiae: New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law, City of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Curtis Johnson, et al v. Serenity Transportation, Inc., et al
as 18-80094
Plaintiff - Petitioner: CURTIS JOHNSON and GARY JOHNSON
Defendant - Respondent: SERENITY TRANSPORTATION, INC., DAVID FRIEDEL, SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Fulcher v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs
as 17-1460
Amicus Curiae: CITY OF ROCHESTER, NEW YORK, JOCELYN SAMUELS, NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA and others
Petitioner: GIULIANO SILVA, DEE FULCHER and TRANSGENDER AMERICAN VETERANS ASSOCIATION
Respondent: SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
King v. The County of Santa Clara We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv03093
Plaintiff: James King
Defendant: The County of Santa Clara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UC Regents, et al v. USA, et al
as 18-80037
Plaintiff - Respondent: REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, JANET NAPOLITANO, In her official capacity as President of the University of California, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant - Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
In Re: Kirstjen M. Nielsen
as 17-3345
Petitioner: Kevin McAleenan, Secretary of Homeland Security, Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States and others
Respondent: Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, Antonio Alarcon and others
Amicus Curiae: City of Los Angeles, California, City of Austin, Texas, City of Boston, Massachusetts and others
In re: USA, et al v. USDC-CASF We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-72917
: In re: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DONALD J. TRUMP, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DONALD J. TRUMP, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest: REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, JANET NAPOLITANO, In her official capacity as President of the University of California, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
In Re: Elaine Duke
as 17-3345
Petitioner: Elaine C. Duke, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States and others
Respondent: Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, Antonio Alarcon and others
Amicus Curiae: City of Los Angeles, California, City of Austin, Texas, City of Boston, Massachusetts and others
Movant: 6Sense Insights, Inc., A Medium Corporation, Adobe Systems Incorporated and others
California v. Trump We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv05895
Plaintiff: State of California , State of Connecticut , State of Delaware and others
Defendant: Donald J. Trump
Amicu: Americas Health Insurance Plans , Nancy Pelosi , Steny H. Hoyer and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
The City of Chicago v. Sessions III Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv05720
Plaintiff: The City of Chicago
Defendant: Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III
Amicu: The California State Legislature , County of Santa Clara , Administrative Law, Constitutional Law, and Immigration Law Scholars and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?