Cases 1 - 10 of 486
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Kenneth ThorntonIn re: Kenneth Thornton
as 24-1941
Petitioner:
In re: KENNETH E. THORNTON
Respondent:
BEAVER COUNTY DETECTIVES OFFICE, in her official capacity, PETER CARBONE, in his individual and official capacity, MARLENE EVERETTE, in her individual and official capacity and others
Defendant:
LISA JONES, in her individual capacity and SHARON D. BUCKLEY, in her individual capacity
United States v. Washington
as 24-7042
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TANNER DEAN WASHINGTON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sullivan v. State of Montana, et al.
as 24-2682
Plaintiff:
RYAN PATRICK SULLIVAN
Defendant:
STATE OF MONTANA, YELLOWSTONE COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY, OFFICER WOLD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
World Association of Icehockey Players Unions North America Division et al v. National Hockey League et al
as 1:2024cv01066
Plaintiff:
World Association of Icehockey Players Unions North America Division, World Association of Icehockey Players Unions USA Corporation, Tanner Gould and others
Defendant:
National Hockey League, Canadian Hockey League, Western Hockey League and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
US v. Tanner Larch
as 24-6331
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TANNER MOREN EAGLE LARCH
Curtis, et al. v. Inslee, et al.
as 24-1869
Plaintiff:
AILA CURTIS, CIERA AGEE, ALISON ARCHER and others
Defendant:
JAY ROBERT INSLEE, PEACEHEALTH, LIZ DUNNE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
