Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 242
Iron Workers Local 401 Annuity Fund v. Humana Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00655
Plaintiff: Iron Workers Local 401 Annuity Fund
Defendant: Humana Inc., Bruce D. Broussard and Susan M. Diamond
LOCAL 94 IBEW HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND et al v. ALL RELIABLE SERVICES, INC.
as 3:2024cv02672
Plaintiff: LOCAL 94, AFFILIATED WITH THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and IBEW LOCAL 94 ANNUITY FUND
Defendant: ALL RELIABLE SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
North Atlantic States Carpenters Central Collection Agency et al v. National Shoring LLC et al
as 3:2024mc00045
Plaintiff: North Atlantic States Carpenters Central Collection Agency, Trustees of the North Atlantic States Carpenters Pension Fund, North Atlantic States Carpenters Guaranteed Annuity Fund and others
Defendant: National Shoring LLC, Peter H. Bove and National Shoring, LLC
Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund et al v. National Retail Installation Corporation et al
as 2:2023mc00044
Petitioner: Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Education and Industry Fund, Trustees of the New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund, Carpenter Contractor Alliance of Metropolitan New York and others
Respondent: National Retail Installations Inc., National Retail Installation Corporation doing business as National Retail Installation Inc., National Retail Installation Incorporated and others
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection v. Fifth Third Bank, N.A.
as 1:2021cv00262
Plaintiff: Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection
Intervenor: Heavy & General Laborers' Local 472 & 172 Pension and Annuity Funds
Defendant: Fifth Third Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 408 WELFARE, PENSION AND ANNUITY FUNDS et al v. FERREIRA CONSTRUCTION, CO. INC.
as 3:2023cv01664
Petitioner: TEAMSTERS LOCAL 408 WELFARE, PENSION AND ANNUITY FUNDS, ZAZZALI, FAGELLA, NOWAK, KLEINBAUM & FRIEDMAN P.C. and ZAZZALI, FAGELLA, NOWAK, KLEINBAUM & FRIEDMAN, P.C.
Respondent: FERREIRA CONSTRUCTION CO, INC. and FERREIRA CONSTRUCTION, CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 408 WELFARE, PENSION AND ANNUITY FUNDS et al v. FERREIRA CONSTRUCTION, CO. INC.
as 3:2023cv01641
Petitioner: TEAMSTERS LOCAL 408 WELFARE, PENSION AND ANNUITY FUNDS and ZAZZALI, FAGELLA, NOWAK, KLIENBAUM & FRIEDMAN, P.C.
Respondent: FERREIRA CONSTRUCTION CO, INC. and FERREIRA CONSTRUCTION, CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Spillane v. New York City District Council of Carpenters and J
as 23-247
Plaintiff / Appellant: Patrick Brendan Spillane and Debra Spillane, AKA Deborah Spillane
Defendant / Appellee: New York City District Council of Carpenters and Joiners of America, New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund and others
Defendant: New York City District Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund
DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN OF THE MID-JERSEY TRUCKING INDUSTRY AND TEAMSTERS LOCAL 701 PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND v. PAYPAL HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv05864
Plaintiff: DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN OF THE MID-JERSEY TRUCKING INDUSTRY AND TEAMSTERS LOCAL 701 PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND
Defendant: PAYPAL HOLDINGS, INC., DANIEL SCHULMAN and JOHN RAINEY
City of St. Clair Shores Police and Fire Retirement System v. Unilever PLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv05011
Plaintiff: City of St. Clair Shores Police and Fire Retirement System
Defendant: Unilever PLC, Alan Jope, Ritva Sotamaa and others
Lead Plaintiff: Teamsters Local 456 Annuity Fund
Petitioner: Westchester Teamsters Pension Fund

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?