Cases 1 - 10 of 10,425
Miller v. Granger et al
as 4:2024cv00845
Plaintiff:
Matthew W. Miller
Defendant:
James Granger, Karinn Kim-Granger and Ty Granger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Amazon.com, Inc. et al v. Apostolas et al
as 3:2024cv01043
Petitioner:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc.
Respondent:
Charles Apostolas, Charley Baskett, Joel Camarena and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
In re: Timothy Miller, II
as 24-303
Petitioner:
In re: TIMOTHY M. MILLER, II
Respondent:
SBK DELIVERY, LLC
LAS AMERICAS IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTER et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2024cv01702
Plaintiff:
LAS AMERICAS IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTER and REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION AND LEGAL SERVICES
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
State of Louisiana v. Garland
as 24-30359
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Missouri, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Mary Cheng, in her official capacity as Acting Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Miller et al v. Tysons Watch and Jewelry Exchange et al
as 1:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
David Miller and Sabrina Miller
Defendant:
Tysons Watch and Jewelry Exchange, Rose Bouchard, Jerry Bouchard and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Saad Khalid v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5091
Plaintiff:
Saad Bin Khalid
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States, U.S. Department of Justice, in his official capacity, only, Christopher A. Wray, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity, only, Charles H. Kable, IV, in his official capacity as Director of the Terrorist Screening Center and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
