Cases 1 - 10 of 814,293
Greenfield v. Brodsky et al
as 2:2024cv14186
Plaintiff:
Kaylen Greenfield
Defendant:
Marc Brodsky, Manthmax Properties LLC and MARC D. BRODSKY REVOCABLE TRUST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Oddy v. Collins et al
as 3:2024cv00617
Plaintiff:
Katherine Oddy
Defendant:
Clyde M. Collins, Jr. and Janie Boyd & Associates Real Estate Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Oddy v. Collins et al
as 3:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
Katherine Oddy
Defendant:
Clyde M. Collins, Jr. and Janie Boyd & Associates Real Estate Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Huber, Robert v. Hoy, Jared et al
as 3:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Robert Huber
Defendant:
Jared Hoy and Gary Boughton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Stewart
as 1:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Luther Steven Montgomery, Jr.
Defendant:
James Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Montgomery v. Robinson
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Luther Steven Montgomery
Defendant:
Julia Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Terry et al
as 2:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Defendant:
Alcornelia Terry, John Q. Hamm and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Elmore County Sheriff et al
as 2:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Hunter Daryl Smith
Defendant:
Bill Franklin Elmore County Sheriff, Tracy Jackson Elmore County Correctional Warden, Josh Tidwell Elmore County Sheriff Deputy/Correctional Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
