Cases 11 - 20 of 38
John Robinson v. D. Asuncion
as 2:2016cv08759
Respondent:
Warden D. Asuncion
Petitioner:
John Robinson
Quick v. Graham
as 16-3353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Desmond Quick
Defendant - Appellee:
Harold Graham, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility
Defendant:
John Robinson, Deputy Superintendent Security, Auburn Correctional Facility, John Pelc, Correctional Officer, Auburn Correctional Facility, John Putnam, Correctional Officer, Auburn Correctional Facility and others
Robinson v. USA - 2255
as 1:2016cv01522
Petitioner:
John Robinson
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hollihan v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00005
Plaintiff:
Richard Hollihan
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, John Wetzel, Bryan Hyde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2014cv08221
Plaintiff:
John Robinson, Jr..
Defendant:
The City Of New York, Levy and Unknown Correction Officers of Rikers Island
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waseem Daker v. John Robinson, et al
as 14-13044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN ROBINSON, Officer, LIEUTENANT J. SIMPSON, GARY D. GEORGE, Chief, Alpharetta Police Department and others
Waseem Daker v. John Robinson, et al
as 14-10779
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN ROBINSON, Officer, J. SIMPSON, GARY D. GEORGE, Chief, Alpharetta Police Department and others
ROBINSON v. SHARTLE et al
as 1:2013cv07877
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBINSON
Respondent:
J.T. SHARTLE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF UNION and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBINSON v. SHARTLE et al
as 2:2013cv06976
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBINSON
Respondent:
J. T. SHARTLE and HARRY MOSKOWITZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
