Cases 41 - 50 of 25,842
JONES v. DIXON
as 3:2024cv00259
Petitioner:
Derick Levell Jones
Respondent:
Secretary, FDC Ricky D. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WATSON v. WHITE et al
as 3:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
TYSON N WATSON
Defendant:
J WHITE and Y JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. JONES et al
as 5:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
LAMAR WOODS
Defendant:
DANIELLE K JONES and WILLIE R CORFT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens v. Jones
as 1:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
YAKENSKI STEVENS
Respondent:
JOSHUA JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. NAACP
as 8:2024cv01408
Plaintiff:
Corey M. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
NAACP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robbins v. Jones et al
as 3:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Steven J Robbins and Steven Joseph Robbins, SR
Defendant:
Sue Jones, Nurse, Correctional Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones, Jr v. Indiana State Prison et al
as 2:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Percy Jones, Jr
Defendant:
Indiana State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones, Jr v. Indiana State Prison et al
as 3:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Percy Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Indiana State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholas Edwards, et al v. J. Rivello, et al
as 24-2031
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS EDWARDS, JOHN HIGHTOWER, MUWSA GREEN and others
Defendant:
JOHN RIVELLO, Warden SCI-Huntingdon, A. WAKEFIELD, Facility Grievance Coordinator, N. DAVIS, Medical Department Supervisor and others
Fudge v. Jones et al
as 3:2024cv00919
Plaintiff:
James Charles Fudge
Defendant:
ODOC/Office-Pop-Mgr. Greg Jones, TRCI-Doc-Supt. T. Rumsey, TRCI-Doc-Supt. E. Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
