Cases 51 - 60 of 31,227
Jennings v. Clarkson et al
as 3:2024cv03101
Plaintiff:
Peter Jennings
Defendant:
. Clarkson, . Howard, William Coonrod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berrios v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00774
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Berrios
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lomax v. John Doe
as 3:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Justin Lomax
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellison v. State of Montana et al
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Lionel Scott Ellison
Defendant:
State of Montana, Montana Attorney Generals Office, Austin Knudsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith-Daye v. City of Poughkeepsie et al
as 7:2024cv03555
Plaintiff:
David P. Smith-Daye
Defendant:
City of Poughkeepsie, Dutchess County Jail, City of Poughkeepsie Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON v. FISHER et al
as 1:2024cv07228
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SCOTT SMITH WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN FISHER, SERGEANT R. RODRIGUEZ, JANE/JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Cederholm et al
as 3:2024cv03173
Plaintiff:
Shaquan Carter
Defendant:
. Cederholm, . Silva, . Righteous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torbert v. Campbell et al
as 3:2024cv03167
Plaintiff:
Jovan A. Torbert
Defendant:
Jack Campbell, Larry Beck, Bill Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00776
Plaintiff:
Louis Turner
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adam Titus v. Officer Thornton, et al
as 24-1714
Plaintiff:
ADAM TITUS
Defendant:
OFFICER THORNTON, Placement Officer, JOHN/JANE DOE, Maintenance Supervisor, WARDEN GOMEZ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
