Cases 71 - 80 of 1,189,206
Harrison v. Collier et al
as 2:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Gregory Jay Harrison and Gregory Harrison
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Tammy Shelby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Labrador v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
Ringo Recto Labrador
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Lt. A. Frye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Smith
as 2:2024cv00378
Petitioner:
Lawrence E. Thompson, Jr.
Respondent:
Nelson Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ortiz-Carrasquillo v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00425
Petitioner:
Giovanni Janick Ortiz-Carrasquillo and Giovanni Janick Ortiz
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Falkowski v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Eric Christopher Falkowski
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughter v. Vaughn et al
as 2:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
James R. Vaughter
Defendant:
Lt. R. Vaughn, Sgt. Andrews, Ofc. Mobley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feitser v. Washington State Penitentiary et al
as 2:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Yuri A Feitser
Defendant:
Washington State Penitentiary, Daniel Cockre, Airway Heights Correction Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Corbray v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05459
Petitioner:
Dennis Derise Corbray
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Craven v. Davis et al
as 3:2024cv05461
Plaintiff:
Jennifer A Craven
Defendant:
Davis and Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
