Cases 71 - 80 of 1,188,479
Franklin v. Estacado Federal Credit Union et al
as 1:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Bryce Franklin
Defendant:
Estacado Federal Credit Union, The GEO Group, Inc., Mark Roddenberry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. Stevenson et al
as 1:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rodriguez
Defendant:
FNU Stevenson, FNU Brown and FNU Horton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephens v. New Mexico et al
as 1:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
Celso Kevin Stephens
Defendant:
New Mexico, Google, TicTok and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Wexford Medical Department et al
as 2:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Mario Rodriguez
Defendant:
Wexford Medical Department, Alisha Tafoya, Cary Maciel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LaDuke v. Miller
as 9:2024cv00748
Petitioner:
Robert LaDuke
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Oneida County Jail et al
as 9:2024cv00749
Plaintiff:
Wayne R. Smith
Defendant:
Oneida County Jail, Robert Maciol, Patternoster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gentry v. Schneider
as 1:2024cv00541
Petitioner:
Matthew Gentry
Respondent:
A. Schneider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mobley v. USA
as 3:2024cv00536
Petitioner:
Douglas Jovan Mobley, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Westerfield v. USA
as 1:2024cv00970
Petitioner:
Jason Westerfield
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
BAUR v. MCGINLEY et al
as 2:2024cv02421
Petitioner:
BRIAN D. BAUR
Respondent:
TOM MCGINLEY, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and MICHELLE A. HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
