Cases 21 - 30 of 3,681
LEON et al v. AT&T INC. et al
as 1:2024cv02397
Plaintiff:
RICHARD INZA, MICHAEL INZA and RAY LEON
Defendant:
STEPHEN J LUCZO, WILLIAM E. KENNARD, JOHN STANKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC v. AT&T INC. et al
as 1:2024cv02395
Defendant:
CYNTHIA B TAYLOR, AT&T SERVICES, INC., RAPHAEL KUBLER and others
Plaintiff:
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Celerity IP LLC et al v. AT&T Corp et al
as 3:2024cv02092
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sonic Limited, Celerity IP LLC and ASUS Technology Licensing Inc
Defendant:
AT&T Services Inc, AT&T Mobility II LLC, Cellco Partnership doing business as Verizon Wireless and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
BUCKLEY v. T-MOBILE, USA INC.
as 2:2024cv04229
Defendant:
T-MOBILE, USA INC.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T. BUCKLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
David Sifuentes, III v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
as 24-1668
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANGEL SIFUENTES, III
Defendant:
AT&T MOBILITY, LLC
v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 3:2024cv04875
Defendant:
Changpeng Zhao, BAM Management US Holdings, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1704
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Julia Robinson, et al v. USA, et al
as 24-12513
Defendant:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, CIA, DIRECTOR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Plaintiff:
KENDALL J. HALL and JULIA MAE ROBINSON
Gorsline v. T-Mobile Corporation
as 5:2024cv04071
Defendant:
T-Mobile Corporation
Plaintiff:
Steve P. Gorsline
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Martin v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
as 2:2024cv01417
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Martin
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
