Cases 1 - 10 of 2,832
Kotevski v. Clinton et al
as 3:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Milan Michael Kotevski
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, William Jefferson Clinton, Estate of George H.W. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Buchwalter v. Twitter, Inc., et al.
as 24-3684
Plaintiff:
GREGG BUCHWALTER, Individually And On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant:
TWITTER, INC., Delaware corporation; Successor X Corp, GOOGLE LLC, a limited liability company, ALPHABET INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Brown v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2024cv11510
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Brown
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Vaiano v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2024cv11515
Plaintiff:
Vincent Vaiano
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
e-Beacon LLC v. Apple Inc.
as 6:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
e-Beacon LLC
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Bertini v. Apple, Inc.
as 5:2024cv03437
Plaintiff:
Charles Bertini
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
MELKOWSKI v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv04827
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MELKOWSKI
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Arakji v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 5:2024cv02202
Plaintiff:
Mazen Arakji
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Amazon, Apple Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Mahon v. Apple Inc., et al.
as 24-3571
Plaintiff:
MARK MAHON
Defendant:
APPLE INC., ITUNES STORE and APPLE DISTRIBUTION INTERNATIONAL, LTD.
Mirage Wine + Spirits, Inc. v. Apple Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04053
Plaintiff:
Mirage Wine Spirits, Inc. Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated doing business as Mirage Wine & Spirits
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Visa Inc. and Mastercard Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
