Miller Act Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 664
United States of America v. Briggs Brothers Enterprises Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv01411
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of Satco, Inc. and United States of America
Defendant: Briggs Brothers Enterprises Corporation and RLI Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America v. Arch Insurance Company et al
as 1:2023cv09461
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Arch Insurance Company, Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company, United States Fire Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Bonds of contractors of public buildings
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of RSM Builders Supply Inc v. The Ross Group Construction Corporation, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00174
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of R.S.M. Builders Supply, Inc. and United States of America for the Use and Benefit of RSM Builders Supply Inc
Defendant: The Ross Group Construction Corporation, LLC and Continental Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
CAPITOL BUILDERS HARDWARE, INC. v. RAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION
as 5:2023cv05462
Plaintiff: Capitol Builders Hardware, Inc. and United States for the use of Capitol Builders Hardware, Inc.
Defendant: RAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION, THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY and RAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION doing business as Silverstrand Construction, a California corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act
Delta Construction Corporation v. David Boland, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00133
Defendant: David Boland, Inc. and Western Surety Company
Plaintiff: United States and Delta Construction Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use of CDEEM, Co. et al v. Concierge Business Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00220
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use of CDEEM, Co. and CDEEM, Co.
Defendant: Concierge Business Solutions, Inc. and American Alternative Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America v. Globalnet and Associates, LLC, et al
as 5:2023cv02140
Plaintiff: S.R. Bray, LLC, a California limited liability company dba Power Plus! and United States of America for the Use and Benefit of S.R. BRAY, LLC, a California limited liability company doing business as Power Plus!
Petitioner: Defendant The Gray Insurance Company, a Louisiana corporation
Defendant: Globalnet & Associates, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, DLC Electric, Inc., a California corporation, Globalnet and Associates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act
Rand Construction Company v. Structsure Projects Inc et al
as 1:2023cv00179
Defendant: Structsure Projects Inc, United Excel Corporation and Arch Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Rand Construction Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America, for the use of Midsouth Paving, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00597
Plaintiff: The United States of America, for the use of Midsouth Paving, Inc.
Defendant: Up-Side Management Company, Inc. and Aegis Security Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Swiss Re Corporate Solutions America Insurance Corporation v. B & N Trucking Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv04040
Plaintiff: Swiss Re Corporate Solutions America Insurance Corporation
Defendant: B & N Trucking Inc., Alfred Benesch & Company, Tristan Dupoy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?