Miller Act Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 148
Reyes Construction, Inc. v. D. P. Industries, Inc.
as 8:2020cv01837
Plaintiff: Reyes Construction, Inc.
Defendant: D. P. Industries, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Type: Contract Miller Act
Reitmeyer v. Stilten LTD, Co., et al
as 6:2020cv00378
Counter Plaintiff: Marcus Eaddy and Stilten, LTD, Co.
Defendant: THE GUARANTEE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA USA, a Michigan Corporation, Stilten is a Texas corporation, Benjamin Eaddy and others
Plaintiff: Reitmeyer & Associates, Inc. d/b/a GC Experts and Douglas Reitmeyer
3Rd Party Defendant: GC Experts, Ryan Hobbs, Sean Reitmeyer and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
D.P. Industries, Inc., a Nevada corporation v. Reyes Construction, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv07916
Petitioner: Zurich American Insurance Company A New York corporation, Reyes Construction, Inc., a California corporation, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the Use and Benefit of D. P. Industries, Inc., a Nevada corporation and others
Plaintiff: D.P. Industries, Inc., a Nevada corporation
Defendant: Zurich American Insurance Company and Reyes Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
Reyes Construction, Inc. v. D. P. Industries, Inc.
as 2:2020cv08661
Defendant: D. P. Industries, Inc., a Nevada corportion, D. P. Industries, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff: Reyes Construction, Inc., a California corporation and Reyes Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Type: Contract Miller Act
USA et al v Sauer Inc et al
as 2:2020cv00865
Not Classified By Court: ESA SOUTH, INC.
Plaintiff: KRANE DEVELOPMENT, INC., D/B/A ADS SERVICES, USA for the use and benefit of Krane Development Inc doing business as A D S Services and E S A South Inc
3Rd Party Defendant: A X I S Insurance Services L L C and O H C Environmental Engineering Inc
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Sauer Inc and Federal Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Type: Contract Miller Act
EP Employment Services, LLC v. Build Masters Construction, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00362
Defendant: BUILD MASTERS CONSTRUCTION, LLC., THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, JACK DEMBICKY and others
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE, AND BENEFIT OF EP EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, LLC D/B/A LABORMAX STAFFING and EP Employment Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America et al v. Archer Western Federal JV et al
as 3:2019cv06198
Defendant: Walsh Federal LLC, Archer Western Federal JV, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and others
Plaintiff: Rapid Fire Protection, Inc., Rapid Fire Protection Inc and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America et al v. Archer Western Construction, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2019cv00375
Plaintiff: TAB Holding Company d/b/a TAB Construction Company, a Nebraska Corporation, United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of TAB Holding Company d/b/a TAB Construction Company, a Nebraska Corporation, TAB Holding Company and others
Defendant: Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America and Archer Western Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
Larry D. Kudsk v. Bara Infoware Inc. et al.
as 2:2019cv05783
Petitioner: Larry D. Kudsk, Val Hornstein and Larry D. Kudsk doing business as Larry Kudsk Construction Services
Respondent: Bara Infoware, Inc. and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Type: Contract Miller Act
North Coast Electric Company v. Safari Electric LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00763
Defendant: RORE, Inc., Berkley Insurance Company, Ronsons SDVOSB P&L JV-1 and others
Plaintiff: North Coast Electric Company and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?