Cases 41 - 50 of 920
The United States of America v. Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
The United States of America
Defendant:
Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company, Guardian Construction Inc., Disaster Systems LLC doing business as Sawyer Disaster Cleanup & Construction and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
DMS Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. et al v. Patriot Construction et al
as 3:2023cv04743
Plaintiff:
DMS Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. and The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Patriot Construction and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
United States of America et al v. Cherokee Construction Services LLC et al
as 3:2023cv05784
Plaintiff:
McKinstry Co., LLC, United States of America and McKinstry Co LLC
Defendant:
Cherokee Construction Services, LLC, Old Republic Surety Company and Cherokee Construction Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
The United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of JRC Mechanical, LLC v. AECOM Construction, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
The United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of JRC Mechanical, LLC
Defendant:
AECOM Construction, Inc., Federal Insurance Company, an Indiana Corporation and Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3133 Miller Act
United States of America et al v CANCO, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv01440
Plaintiff:
The United States of America for the use of The Standard Plumbing & Heating Company, LLC, The Standard Plumbing & Heating Company, LLC, United States of America and others
Defendant:
CANCO, LLC and Cincinnati Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Ferguson Enterprises, LLC v. Jones & Smith Contractors, LLC et al
as 7:2023cv01180
Plaintiff:
Ferguson Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Ferguson Enterprises, LLC of Virginia and Ferguson Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Ferguson Enterprises, LLC of Virginia, United States of America for the use and benefit of the foregoing
Defendant:
Jones & Smith Contractors, LLC, Sauer Construction, LLC a/k/a Sauer Incorporated, Federal Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
USA for the use and benefit of TST Insulation,LLC v Federal Insurance Company et al
as 4:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use and benefit of TST Insulation, LLC d/b/a Retro Insulation and United States of America for the use and benefit of TST Insulation, LLC doing business as Retro Insulation
Defendant:
Federal Insurance Company, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, Hartford Fire Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 1:2023at00589
Plaintiff:
DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. and The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Solpac Construction, Inc. dba Soltek Pacific Construction Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc., et al. v. Solpac Construction, Inc., et al.
as 1:2023cv01050
Plaintiff:
The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. and DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Solpac Construction, Inc. a California Corporation Doing business as Soltek Pacific Construction Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of ACTS Group, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Company et al
as 4:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
ACTS Group, Inc. and United States of America for the use and benefit of ACTS Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Federal Insurance Company and AECOM Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
