Miller Act Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 274
Simpson Unlimited, Inc. v. The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01400
Defendant: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Zurich American Insurance Company, The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company and others
Plaintiff: Simpson Unlimited, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
Midwest Steel, Inc. v. Clark McCarthy Healthcare Partners II et al
as 3:2019cv00130
Defendant: Clark McCarthy Healthcare Partners II, Federal Insurance Company, Zurich American Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: Midwest Steel, Inc. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
Robert Lloyd Electric Co., Inc v. Fluor Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 7:2019cv00036
Defendant: Zurich American Insurance Co., Fluor Enterprises, Inc., Fluor Daniel Caribbean, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Robert Lloyd Electric Co., Inc
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
United States of America et al v. Environet Inc et al
as 3:2019cv05275
Plaintiff: PSW Electric, Inc.
Defendant: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Zurich American Insurance Company and ENVIRONET, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America et al v. Contrack Watts Garney JV et al
as 5:2019cv00263
Plaintiff: Pave-Tech Inc and The United States of America
Defendant: Does 1 through 20, Garney Federal Inc, Contrack Watts Garney JV and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States for the use and benefit of Mumford & Miller Concrete, Inc. v. Travelers Insurance Company et al
as 1:2019cv00182
Plaintiff: United States for the use and benefit of Mumford & Miller Concrete, Inc. and Mumford & Miller Concrete, Inc.
Defendant: Travelers Insurance Company, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland/Zurich American Insurance Company, Federal Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Boscacci, Inc., v. Advanced Technology Construction
as 3:2019cv00263
Plaintiff: BOSCACCI, INC., United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Boscacci, Inc. and United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Boscacci, Inc. A California corporation doing business as Amp Electric
Defendant: ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY C ONSTRUCTION, Zurich American Insurance Company and Advanced Technology Construction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America et al v. Totem Electric of Tacoma Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv05006
Defendant: Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, Continental Casualty Company, RQ Construction LLC and others
Plaintiff: System Tech Washington Inc and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv06047
Defendant: Continental Casualty Company, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland / Zurich American Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of Totem Electric of Tacoma, Inc., Totem Electric of Tacoma Inc and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF Z-MODULAR, LLC v. MCN BUILD, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv02947
Defendant: FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, INC., ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. and MCN BUILD, INC.
Plaintiff: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF Z-MODULAR, LLC and Z-MODULAR, LLC
Counter Defendant: WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?