Miller Act Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,947
The United States of America for the use and benefit of STOA International/Florida, Inc. v. Brantley Construction Services, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00573
Plaintiff: The United States of America for the use and benefit of STOA International/Florida, Inc. a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as STOA Architects
Defendant: Brantley Construction Services, LLC and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of Axis Construction Corporation v. Asturian Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00354
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of Axis Construction Corporation
Defendant: Asturian Group, Inc. and Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR USE AND BENEFIT OF ELITE ROOFING SUPPLY - CO, LLC et al v. AMERICAN ALTERNATIVE INSURANCE CORPORATION et al
as 3:2024cv06544
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR USE AND BENEFIT OF ELITE ROOFING SUPPLY - CO, LLC doing business as ELITE ROOFING SUPPLY and ELITE ROOFING SUPPLY - CO, LLC doing business as ELITE ROOFING SUPPLY
Defendant: AMERICAN ALTERNATIVE INSURANCE CORPORATION, CONCIERGE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC, VERTEX ROOFING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America et al v. Heffler Contracting Group et al
as 3:2024cv00915
Plaintiff: The United States of America and BKM OfficeWorks, LLC
Defendant: Heffler Contracting Group, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 bc Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America v. Federal Insurance Company et al
as 8:2024cv01441
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Federal Insurance Company, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Bonds of contractors of public buildings
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America, for the use and benefit of Tate & Hill, Inc. v. Sanford Federal, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00356
Plaintiff: The United States of America, for the use and benefit of Tate & Hill, Inc.
Defendant: Sanford Federal, Inc. d/b/a Talon Veteran Services, Inc. and Markel Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of JRC Mechanical, LLC v. Sanford Federal, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00342
Plaintiff: The United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of JRC Mechanical, LLC
Defendant: Sanford Federal, Inc. doing business as Talon Veteran Services, Inc. and Markel Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 0270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Nails and Staples, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America et al
as 6:2024cv00255
Plaintiff: Nails and Staples, Inc. The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Nails and Staples, Inc. doing business as Express Interiors
Defendant: Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America and Direct Steel, LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America et al. v Austin Building and Design Inc., et al.
as 1:2024cv00843
Plaintiff: United States of America and Erie Affiliates, Inc.
Defendant: Austin Building and Design Inc. doing business as Austin Company, American Home Insurance Company, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America et al v. Rockford Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00104
Plaintiff: United States of America and HIS Constructors, Inc.
Defendant: Rockford Corporation and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?