Cases 41 - 50 of 533
Golden IT, LLC v. US
as 23-1992
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GOLDEN IT, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES and ITCON SERVICES, LLC
Percipient.ai, Inc. v. US
as 23-1970
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PERCIPIENT.AI, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES and CACI, INC.-FEDERAL
USA v. Lippard
as 1:2023cv01078
Plaintiff:
United States of America and USA
Defendant:
Karl Lippard and Karl C. Lippard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001 - Federal Debt Collection Act
KeyBank National Association v. Monolith Solar Associates LLC
as 23-759
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KeyBank National Association
Appellant:
City of Troy
Defendant:
Monolith Solar Associates LLC, SAE Sun and Earth Energy Incorporated, Solar Management Group 2013, LLC and others
Appellee:
Daniel Scouler
TD Bank N.A. v. Wayne Shim, DMD, LLC
as 4:2023cv40048
Plaintiff:
TD Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Wayne Shim, DMD, LLC
Trustee:
Bay State Savings Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Miller v. State Farm et al
as 2:2023cv00586
Plaintiff:
Duhjuan L Miller
Defendant:
State Farm and Son Farney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
United States of America v. Emery et al
as 3:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
William Emery, Jr and Pansy Eunice Emery
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
United States of America v. Van Spa LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Van Spa, LLC, Robert Keeney and Kim Cuc Tran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Promissory Note
Eagle Technologies, Inc. v. US
as 23-1473
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EAGLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES and DYNANET CORP.
State of Arkansas v. Hankins et al
as 3:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
State of Arkansas
Defendant:
Demario Lashun Hankins and Richard Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
