Cases 51 - 60 of 109
United States of America v. Chappelle
as 8:1983dv01734
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Alonzo Chappelle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of VA Overpayment
United States of America v. Tate
as 8:1983dv01784
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
David Tate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of VA Overpayment
United States of America v. Smith
as 7:1983dv01783
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kinard D Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of VA Overpayment
United States of America v. Davis
as 6:1983dv01733
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Reginald F Davis, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of VA Overpayment
United States of America v. Rollins
as 7:1983dv01782
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Edward J Rollins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of VA Overpayment
Philip King v. US Dept of Veterans Affairs, et al
as 12-60835
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILIP M. KING
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, ERIC K. SHINSEKI, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
United States of America v. Myers
as 2:2012cv02131
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kathleen R. Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
PERRY v. UNITED STATES ARMY
as 1:2012cv00073
Plaintiff:
KENNETH PERRY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Melchor Jayme v. US VA, et al
as 11-3724
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELCHOR R. JAYME
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES VETERANS ADMINISTRATION, ERIC SHINECKI and KENNETH J. MCQUOWN, Veterans Service Manager
United States of America v. Mercadel
as 1:2011cv00819
Defendant:
Larry P. Mercadel, Jr.
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
