Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Faris v. Seu, et al.
as 1:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Robert Faris
Defendant:
Scott W. H. Seu, Constance H. Lau, Paul K. Ito and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Assad v. Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
George Assad
Defendant:
Scott W.H. Seu, Thomas B. Fargo, Peggy Y. Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Cole et al v. Johns et al
as 3:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
Michael Cole, Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc. and Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Timothy E. Johns, James A. Ajello, Scott W. H. Seu and others
Wolkomir v. Tyson et al
as 1:2021cv01043
Plaintiff:
Michelle Wolkomir
Defendant:
Dean Banks, Robert Thurber, Jeffrey K. Schomburger and others
Hugues v. Tyson et al
as 1:2021cv00730
Defendant:
DEAN BANKS, ROBERT THURBER, GAURDIE E. BANISTER and others
Plaintiff:
GERVAT HUGUES
Taylor v. Amor et al
as 1:2019cv02078
Defendant:
Kevin M. Slawin, Reid M. Huber, James M. Daly and others
Nominal Defendant:
Bellicum Pharamceuticals, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jessica Amor and Mildred Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ludovissy et al v. Bellicum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv02450
Defendant:
Kevin M. Slawin, Reid M. Huber, James M. Daly and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Ludovissy and Ann Gordon Trammell
Sciabacucchi v. Howley et al
as 1:2017cv01971
Defendant:
TERRANCE M. PARADINE, MICHAEL S. GRAFF, RAYMOND F. LAUBENTHAL and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SCIABACUCCHI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelly v. Wine et al
as 0:2017cv03885
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Kelly
Defendant:
Scott W. Wine , Annette K. Clayton , Kevin M. Farr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CANFIELD v. MODANY et al
as 1:2015cv02011
Plaintiff:
DONNALD CANFIELD
Defendant:
JOHN F. COZZI, JOHN E. DEAN, DANIEL FITZPATRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
