Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Thomas P. DiNapoli v. Ford et al
as 1:2023cv04142
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. DiNapoli, Comptroller of the State of New York, as Administrative Head of the New York State and Local Retirement System, and as Trustee of the New York State Common Retirement Fund and Thomas P. DiNapoli
Defendant:
Robert B. Ford, Robert J. Alpern, Roxanne S. Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
In re: Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp Derivative Lit
as 22-3027
Plaintiff / Appellee:
In re: COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORP DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN LAUTZENHEISER, Derivatively on behalf of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., MICHAEL S. GRANIERO, III, Derivatively on behalf of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., MARJORIE A. HOY, as Trustee and Beneficiary of the James. B. Hoy & Marjorie A. Hoy TTEES FBO Marjorie A. Hoy Rev Liv Trust Derivatively on behalf of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp and others
Defendant / Appellee:
COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORP, GORDON COBURN and STEVEN E. SCHWARTZ
Palm Tran, Inc. - Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1577 Pension Plan v. Emergent BioSolutions Inc. et al
as 8:2021cv00955
Plaintiff:
Palm Tran, Inc. - Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1577 Pension Plan
Defendant:
Emergent BioSolutions Inc., Richard S. Lindahl, Robert G. Kramer and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
In Re: Citigroup Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation
as 1:2020cv09438
Defendant:
Alexander Wynaendts, James S. Turley, Grace E. Dailey and others
Plaintiff:
Employees' Retirement System of The State of Rhode Island, Dean Andersen and Asbestos Workers Philadelphia Welfare and Pension Fund
Nominal Defendant:
Citigroup Inc.
Interested Party:
Westchester Putnam Counties Heavy & Highway Laborers Local 60 Benefit Funds and Police & Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit
Lead Plaintiff:
The Employee Retirement System of the City of Providence
Electrical Workers Pension Fund, Local 103, I.B.E.W. v. Anderson et al
as 2:2020cv05128
Defendant:
Luis A. Reyes, K. Jon Taylor, Christopher D. Pappas and others
Plaintiff:
Electrical Workers Pension Fund, Local 103, I.B.E.W.
Interested Party:
City of Philadelphia Board of Pensions and Retirement
Petitioner:
Massachusetts Laborer Pension Fund Derivatively on Behalf of FirstEnergy Corp
Not Classified By Court:
John Donovan
Miller v. Anderson et al
as 5:2020cv01743
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L. Miller
Defendant:
Christopher D. Pappas, Charles E. Jones, Donald T. Misheff and others
Intervenor:
Electrical Workers Pension Fund, Local 103, I.B.E.W., Local 103, Electrical Workers Pension Fund, I.B.E.W., Employees Retirement System of the City of St. Louis and others
Petitioner:
Massachusetts Laborer Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Tharayil v. Lorberbaum et al
as 4:2020cv00185
Defendant:
Karen A. Smith Bogart, Filip Balcaen, William H. Runge, III and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Tharayil
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Central Laborers Pension Fund, Teamsters Local 456 Annuity Fund and Teamsters Local 456 Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chopp v. Bradway et al
as 1:2020cv00326
Defendant:
Robert A. Bradway, Susan C. Schwab, Lynn J. Good and others
Nominal Defendant:
The Boeing Company
Plaintiff:
Alan Chopp
Intervenor:
Construction and General Building Laborers' Local Union No. 79 General Fund
Roofers Local No. 149 Pension Fund v. Clerico et al
as 1:2019cv02062
Defendant:
William Norris Jennings, Michael Dinkins, James S. Ely, III and others
Plaintiff:
Roofers Local No. 149 Pension Fund
Nominal Defendant:
Community Health Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Steamfitters Local 449 Pension & Retirement Security Funds v. Merrill et al
as 1:2019cv04617
Defendant:
Brian C. Beazer, Stephen P. Zelnak, Jr., Elizabeth S. Acton and others
Plaintiff:
Steamfitters Local 449 Pension & Retirement Security Funds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
