Other Contract Cases
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Pisecco et al v. NCS Pearson, Inc.
as 4:2014cv03003
Plaintiff: Stewart Pisecco and Harper Trammell
Defendant: NCS Pearson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vision Bank v. Sundance, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00038
Plaintiff: Vision Bank
Defendant: Sundance, LLC , Charles H. Trammell , Louis J. Principio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vision Bank v. Bama Bayou, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00572
Plaintiff: Vision Bank
Defendant: Bama Bayou, LLC , Mitchell Company , John B. Saint and others
Counter_defendant: Park National Corporation , Bank of Franklin , West Alabama Bank & Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Amalgamated Transit Union, division 618 et al v. Rhode Island Public Transit Authority
as 1:2009cv00399
Plaintiff: Amalgamated Transit Union, division 618, Amalgamated Transit Union, division 618, Henry B. Sheehan and others
Defendant: Rhode Island Public Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Type: Contract None
Riverside Owner, LLC v. Smallwood, Reynolds, Stewart, Stewart & Associates, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00203
Plaintiff: Riverside Owner, LLC and Riverside Owner, LLC
Defendant: Smallwood, Reynolds, Stewart, Stewart & Associates, Inc., R. Joseph Trammell and Robert Riddell
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract None
Trammel Crow Co v. Virginia Surety Co
as 09-10041
Plaintiff - Appellee: TRAMMEL CROW RESIDENTIAL CO
Defendant - Appellant: VIRGINIA SURETY COMPANY INC
Trammel Crow Residential Company v. Virginia Surety Company Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00501
Plaintiff: Trammel Crow Residential Company and Trammel Crow Residential Company
Defendant: Virginia Surety Company Inc and Virginia Surety Company Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?