Land Condemnation Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 2.419 Acres, +/-, in Johnston County, NC, Located on PIN 03-Q-02-001-D, Described as Being a Portion of that Certain 126.5 Acres Described in NC General Warranty Deed Recorded in B. 4559, P. 775; et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv00318
Plaintiff: Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 2.419 Acres, +/-, in Johnston County, NC, Located on PIN 03-Q-02-001-D, Described as Being a Portion of that Certain 126.5 Acres Described in NC General Warranty Deed Recorded in B. 4559, P. 775;, Peter Waverly Edwards and Linda Rae Edwards
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 3.83 Acres, More or Less, in Cumberland County, North Carolina, Located on Parcel Identification No. 0474-95-0551 Identified in Deed of Correction Recorded in Book 3646 Page 879 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv00261
Plaintiff: Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 3.83 Acres, More or Less, in Cumberland County, North Carolina, Located on Parcel Identification No. 0474-95-0551 Identified in Deed of Correction Recorded in Book 3646 Page 879, Andrew David Horne, Ronald Wayne Ruple and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Lopipero et al v. County Of Nassau
as 2:2018cv03102
Plaintiff: Diane R. Lopipero and Peter Charles Lopipero
Defendant: County Of Nassau
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 946 Complaint in Condemnation - Eminent Domain
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No(s). WV-DO-SHB-016.000-ROW et al
as 1:2018cv00091
Plaintiff: Rover Pipeline LLC
Defendant: Rover Tract No(s). WV-DO-SHB-016.000-ROW, Jerry E. Hyatt, Michael Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No(s). WV-DO-SHC-015.000-ROW-T and WV-DO-SHC-015.970-TAR-3 et al
as 1:2018cv00088
Plaintiff: Rover Pipeline LLC
Defendant: Rover Tract No(s). WV-DO-SHC-015.000-ROW-T and WV-DO-SHC-015.970-TAR-3, Charlene K. Cunningham, Ronnie C. Doak and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.38 ACRES, TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.51 ACRES IN HOLLAND TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1015-22-55.01 et al
as 3:2018cv01651
Plaintiff: PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant: PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.38 ACRES, TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.51 ACRES IN HOLLAND TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1015-22-55.01, ROBERT LONERGAN, NAOMI LONERGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rohrs, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00225
Defendant: Rohrs, Dona Powell, United Telephone Company of Ohio and others
Plaintiff: Rover Pipeline LLC
Commissioner: David Rosenblum Cohen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. 5.167 Acres of Land, more or less, situated in Robertson County, Texas et al
as 6:2017cv00030
Defendant: 0.078 Acres of Land, more or less, situated in Robertson County, Texas, 5.167 Acres of Land, more or less, situated in Robertson County, Texas, Peter and Camella Scamardo, FLP and others
Plaintiff: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. 171.54 Acres of land, more or less, in Fairfield, Hocking, Monroe, Morgan, Muskingum, Noble, Perry, and Vinton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00070
Defendant: 171.54 Acres of land, more or less, in Fairfield, Hocking, Monroe, Morgan, Muskingum, Noble, Perry, and Vinton, Heirs of Marcella D. Allen, Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Interested Party: Craig Paynter, Keith W Schneider and Shawn Judge
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 a
USA v. Land St Martin Parish
as 6:2016cv00016
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: M P S Two L L C, Elizabeth Ann Snyder Hamilton, Sarah Jane Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?