Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Yeshiva of Flatbush v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2024cv04483
Plaintiff:
Yeshiva of Flatbush
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Property Ejectment
SPA 77 K L.P. v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2024cv02728
Plaintiff:
SPA 77 K L.P.
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
MARK ENTERPRISES, LLC - SERIES 4 v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 2:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
MARK ENTERPRISES, LLC - SERIES 4
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
MARK ENTERPRISES, LLC - SERIES 4 v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 2:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
MARK ENTERPRISES, LLC - SERIES 4
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Banyas v. United States Postal Service
as 8:2021cv02355
Plaintiff:
John Banyas
Defendant:
United States Postal Service doing business as Cortez - Main Office (111830-001)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Bunker Hill Mall, LLC v. U.S. Postal Service
as 1:2019cv11229
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Bunker Hill Mall, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Kasik, Jr. et al v. United States Postal Service (USPS)
as 5:2019cv01157
Plaintiff:
Martin A. Kasik, Jr. and Sharon K. Kasik
Defendant:
United States Postal Service (USPS)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
SORCE REALTY GROUP, LLC v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 3:2017cv04472
Plaintiff:
SORCE REALTY GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
J. Spodek, et al v. USPS
as 17-10384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROSALIND SPODEK and ESTATE OF J. LEONARD SPODEK, Estate of J. Leonard Spodek, by and through Andrew Spodek, Personal Representative
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
The City of Winchester v. Miller et al
as 3:2016cv03142
Plaintiff:
The City of Winchester
Defendant:
Charlie Miller , Michelle Martens and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
