Cases 51 - 60 of 3,615
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Oliver v. AT&T Mobility, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2024cv01690
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Oliver
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, L.L.C. and AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Mann v. Mayorkas
as 6:2024cv00200
Defendant:
Thapeloe John, Jeff Isabella, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mann, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Solis, et al. v. T-Mobile US, Inc., et al.
as 24-2412
Plaintiff:
JANNET SOLIS, MICHAEL ORTEGA, ADVANCED WEIGHT LOSS SURGICAL ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
T-MOBILE US, INC. and UNITEDHEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY
Sepulveda v. T-Mobile USA Inc
as 2:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Rudy Sepulveda
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hasson et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01580
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hasson and Chad Graddy
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Peralta v. T-Mobile
as 4:2024cv02229
Plaintiff:
Lizbeth Peralta
Defendant:
T-Mobile
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Williams v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02732
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Sprint Corporation
Plaintiff:
Shalace L. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Emmanuel Agbara v. AT&T Mobility LLC
as 24-7046
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Agbara
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC, Evelyn Onyenyi Okoji, Nigerian Catholic Community at St. Jerome Catholic Church and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
