Cases 21 - 30 of 171
Ray v. Five Brothers Mortgage Company Services and Securing Inc. et al
as 7:2018cv00126
Defendant:
John Doe, Epling Construction, LLC, Ditech Financial LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Glenda Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ruby Realty, LLC v. Ditech Financial LLC
as 3:2018cv12503
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC
Plaintiff:
Ruby Realty, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ruby Realty, LLC v. Ditech Financial LLC
as 3:2018cv12503
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC
Plaintiff:
Ruby Realty, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Henry v. Ditech Financial LLC et al
as 4:2018cv04414
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC (f/k/a Green Tree Servicing LLC), Carrington Mortgage Services LLC, The Bank of New York Mellon and others
Plaintiff:
Antwan Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jannesari v. Ditech Financial LLC et al
as 4:2018cv03359
Plaintiff:
Key Jannesari
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association and Ditech Financial LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Alcazaren v. Ditech Financial, LLC
as 3:2018cv00277
Plaintiff:
Peter Alcazaren
Defendant:
Ditech Financial, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morse v. Ditech Financial LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00655
Defendant:
Phillip Pierceall, Ditech Financial LLC, David Stockman and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Carl Morse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
White et al v. Ditech Financial, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00790
Defendant:
New Residential Mortgage LLC, SFMC, LP, Bank Of America, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Y. Michelle White and Michelle Musser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Castellanos v. Ditech Financial LLC
as 5:2018cv00964
Plaintiff:
ANUAR CASTELLANOS
Defendant:
DITECH FINANCIAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ditech Financial, LLC v. Limin et al
as 2:2018cv01545
Defendant:
Cao Limin, Safari Homeowners Association, Liu Qiuxia and others
Plaintiff:
Ditech Financial, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
