Cases 51 - 60 of 90
Shuttlesworth et al v. Taylor
as 1:2016cv00500
Plaintiff:
Gempro, Inc. and Colleen Shuttlesworth
Defendant:
Diane J Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Metz et al v. Invisible Blackman et al
as 5:2016cv10988
Plaintiff:
James Metz, Kim Rancourt and Mary Beth Leward
Defendant:
Invisible Blackman, Charles Acho, Adolph Hitler and others
FARR v. PAC-WEST DISTRIBUTING NV LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00175
Plaintiff:
EVERETT L. FARR, III
Defendant:
PAC-WEST DISTRIBUTING NV LLC , TRENT TAYLOR and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gilbert v. Fawcett et al
as 2:2015cv00126
Plaintiff:
Debra Gilbert
Defendant:
Joseph Fawcett , Jane Doe, Beverly Kogut and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Taylor v. Regency Hospital Company of South Carolina LLC
as 4:2015cv02686
Plaintiff:
Charles Taylor
Defendant:
Regency Hospital Company of South Carolina LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Beehive Federal Credit Union et al
as 4:2015cv00238
Plaintiff:
Chris Johnson
Defendant:
Beehive Federal Credit Union, Advantage Plus Federal Credit Union, Capital Educators Federal Credit Union and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Finston v. Christoffersen et al
as 2:2015cv12013
Plaintiff:
Matthew Finston
Defendant:
Taylor Christoffersen, Samuel Charles Cary, Brady Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bates et al v. Antique Airplane Association, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00087
Plaintiff:
David Joseph Bates and Bates Bi-Planes, LLC
Defendant:
Antique Airplane Association, Inc. , Airpower Museum, Inc. , Brent Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jennifer Taylor et al v. Timothy D. Francis et al
as 2:2015cv01595
Defendant:
Applied Kinesiology Educational Services, Does, Dr. Timothy Duanne Francis, a Professional Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Taylor
TAYLOR v. Answers Corporation
as 0:2015cv60135
Plaintiff:
VINCENT TAYLOR
Defendant:
Answers Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
