Cases 61 - 70 of 116
Gamble v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al
as 2:2016cv02402
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Gamble
Defendant:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Martin Ebel, Katharine Kores and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Martin
as 1:2016cv01732
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
Richard B. Martin, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Walsh
as 8:2016cv01731
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
Howard J. Walsh, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brams v. Martin et al
as 9:2016cv80491
Plaintiff:
Daniel J Brams
Defendant:
Samuel Kevin Martin, Todd Mueller and Charise Mueller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe v. Houston et al
as 3:2016cv00421
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Michelle Houston, Maria Martin, Kathy Edeker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin v. Finley et al
as 3:2015cv01620
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Martin
Defendant:
Thomas J. Finley, Amil Minora, Michael Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MIANGO et al v. DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO et al
as 1:2015cv01265
Plaintiff:
JACQUES DIEUDONNE ITONG MIANGO , MICHELINE LOMPO MIANGO and ANDRE PAUL NGOMA
Defendant:
DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO, JOSEPH KABILA KABANGE, EMBASSY OF THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. City of McComb, Mississippi et al
as 5:2015cv00055
Plaintiff:
Sybil Smith
Defendant:
City of McComb, Mississippi, Anthony Daniels, Kenyanna Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Virginia College, L.L.C. v. Warren Martin, Jr., et al
as 14-60548
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VIRGINIA COLLEGE, L.L.C.
Defendant - Appellant:
KENYA R. MARTIN and KENYA R. MARTIN, L.L.C.
Young et al v. Martin et al
as 7:2014cv03172
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Young and Keyo Development Corporation, The
Defendant:
Trudy U Martin and David A Hogue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
