Cases 81 - 90 of 95
Poppell v. Citicorp North America, Inc.
as 2:2010cv00083
Plaintiff:
Edmond V. Poppell
Defendant:
Citicorp North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mastrion et al v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2010cv00662
Defendant:
Blue Martini Las Vegas, LLC, Doe Police Officer I (Encinio), Doe Police Officer II (Yanas) and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Mastrion and Shelley Mastrion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vazirani et al v. Heitz
as 6:2009cv01311
Plaintiff:
Anil Vazirani and Secured Financial Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
Mark V. Heitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Quatkemeyer v. Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure et al
as 3:2009cv00746
Plaintiff:
Bradford A. Quatkemeyer, M.D. and Bradford A. Quatkemeyer, M.D.
Defendant:
Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure, Susan Marie Berberich, M.D., William Briscoe, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Rogers v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation
as 5:2008cv00112
Plaintiff:
Ronnie V. Rogers
Defendant:
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Marcelin v. Peake et al
as 1:2008cv10974
Plaintiff:
Charles V. Marcelin
Defendant:
James B. Peake, George R. Boulin and James Rys
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Henderson v. Claire's Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv01317
Plaintiff:
Carolyn V. Henderson
Defendant:
Claire's Stores, Inc. and Claire's Boutiques, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Gretchen Schulze, et al v. Cindy Maglasang, et al
as 08-16041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GRETCHEN V. SCHULZE and MICHAEL F. SCHULZE
Defendant - Appellee:
CINDY MAGLASANG, CONRAD HO and KENNETH SORENSON
Kanal Gaston v. State of NJ
as 08-1831
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KANAL V. GASTON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NJ
Holifield v. City of Birmingham et al
as 2:2008cv00109
Plaintiff:
Riley L Holifield, Jr
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Annetta Nunn, D Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
