Cases 91 - 100 of 881
MASTROCOLA et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv01970
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MASTROCOLA and KATHLEEN MASTROCOLA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
ZUNIGA v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2019cv00726
Plaintiff:
CESAR ZUNIGA
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
HICKS v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2019cv00540
Plaintiff:
MORGAN HICKS
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
DIPAOLA v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2019cv01374
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DIPAOLA
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
BALCH v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2019cv01237
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
MARK BALCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCDADE v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2019cv01031
Plaintiff:
JOHN MCDADE
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
COLON v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2019cv00160
Plaintiff:
KERWIN COLON
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
GALLAGHER v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2019cv00176
Plaintiff:
SEAN GALLAGHER
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
BLANDING v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2018cv05331
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
KEITH BLANDING
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
BITER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 3:2018cv00262
Plaintiff:
RONALD P. BITER
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
