Cases 21 - 30 of 84
BITER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 3:2018cv00262
Plaintiff:
RONALD P. BITER
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Strain v. National Rail Passenger Corporation
as 1:2017cv01522
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Strain
Defendant:
National Rail Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Spier v. Long Island Rail Road Company
as 2:2017cv04578
Defendant:
Sharon L Federman, Long Island Rail Road Company and Matthew E. Morra
Plaintiff:
Steven P. Spier
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Cortes et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 5:2017cv00128
Petitioner:
Francisco P Cortes and Dierdre C Coddington Bonds De Cortes-Cruz
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sinclair v. Long Island Rail Road Company
as 2:2017cv01610
Defendant:
Long Island Rail Road Company
Plaintiff:
James P. Sinclair
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
McEvoy vs Mabus
as 3:2016cv05672
Plaintiff:
Edward P McEvoy
Defendant:
Ray Mabus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Duran v. San Luis Central Railroad Company
as 1:2016cv01487
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Duran
Defendant:
San Luis Central Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Manning v. Soo Line Railroad Co.
as 2:2016cv01011
Plaintiff:
Dennis P Manning
Defendant:
Soo Line Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
COLEMAN v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv01348
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. COLEMAN
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (TSA), THE OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY APPELLATE BORD (OPRAB) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Manning v. Soo Line Railroad Co.
as 1:2016cv02420
Plaintiff:
Dennis P Manning
Defendant:
Soo Line Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
