Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Mario Arguijo v. United States of America, et al
as 2:2018cv10498
Defendant:
floyd edward travis, Jr, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,, united states postal service and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Arguijo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Textron Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00688
Defendant:
Randall E Bray, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia Floyd Johnson
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
ARNOLD v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
as 1:2009cv00452
Plaintiff:
Wallace Floyd Arnold
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc. and CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
ARNOLD v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
as 2:2009cv02448
Plaintiff:
WALLACE FLOYD ARNOLD
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
YEARWOOD v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2008cv03036
Plaintiff:
FLOYD H. YEARWOOD
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tony Bailey et al v. The United States of America et al
as 2:2008cv03921
Plaintiff:
Tony Bailey, Tony Bailey, Danielle Lacuen-Floyd and others
Defendant:
The United States of America, The Greater Los Angeles Veterans Medical Center, The Department of Veteran's Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Tutson v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2007cv00271
Plaintiff:
Floyd Tutson, Floyd Tutson and Floyd Tutson
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company, BNSF Railway Company and BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Tutson v. BNSF Railway Company
as 9:2007cv00025
Plaintiff:
Floyd Tutson and Floyd Tutson
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company and BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
