Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Haynes v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2022cv01244
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wade Haynes
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Adams v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
as 2:2022cv02952
Plaintiff:
Wade Adams
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Caskey et al v. Toms Auto Transport Inc et al
as 5:2022cv00451
Plaintiff:
Colonel Wade Caskey and Brian Lee
Defendant:
Toms Auto Transport Inc, Thomas H Chavez, Canal Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Wade v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2021cv00027
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Della Christine Wade
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Wade v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2019cv00139
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Della Christine Wade
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Cannon v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 3:2019cv00086
Plaintiff:
Wade A. Cannon
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK) and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Wade v. Perez, et al.
as 3:2017cv03830
Plaintiff:
E. K. Wade
Defendant:
Thomas Perez, U.S. Department of Labor, Jeh Charles Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wade v. Perez, et al.
as 2:2016cv02354
Plaintiff:
E. K. Wade
Defendant:
Thomas Perez, U.S. Department of Labor, Jeh Charles Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCann v. United States of America et al
as 2:2015cv00446
Plaintiff:
Thadnisha McCann
Defendant:
Dumas Wade, United States of America and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Wade v. Union Pacific Railroad
as 14-1230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK G. WADE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
