Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Bullock v. Harris et al
as 1:2017cv00697
Plaintiff:
Nichelle Bullock
Defendant:
Dick Harris and Son Trucking Co., Inc., Leo Bethea , Jr., James E. Drye and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Pro Transport & Leasing, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00817
Plaintiff:
Deion Moore
Defendant:
Pro Transport & Leasing, Inc. and Darrin Bullock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pazon et al v. Great Divide Insurance Company et al
as 2:2016cv14848
Defendant:
Lester E. Bullock , Great Divide Insurance Company and GEICO General Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Dylen Pazon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bullock v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co
as 5:2016cv00067
Plaintiff:
Kimberly W Bullock
Defendant:
Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Laney v. Bullock et al
as 2:2015cv01056
Plaintiff:
Neal O Laney
Defendant:
GEICO General Insurance Company , Heather Bullock and Evan Ragland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bullock v. Lauri Janae Flennigan Miller Succession
as 5:2014cv02802
Defendant:
Lauri Janae Flennigan Miller Succession
Plaintiff:
Jimmy E Bullock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BULLOCK v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv04888
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN BULLOCK
Defendant:
GREYHOUND LINES, INC. and JOHN DOE (GREYHOUND DRIVER)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnett et al v. Zurich American Insurance Company
as 3:2012cv00326
Plaintiff:
Telimathy Barnett
Defendant:
James L Bullock and Zurich American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Otten v. Bullock et al
as 2:2010cv04202
Plaintiff:
Lydia R. Otten
Defendant:
Sheri Bullock and Don Krahn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Demery v. Bullock et al
as 5:2010cv01168
Plaintiff:
WB Demery
Defendant:
David Bullock , Pinnergy and St. Paul Protective Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
