Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Arnold v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01553
Plaintiff:
Ashley G. Arnold
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bw Diversity -Breach of Warranty
Gurule v. Ford Motor Company et al.
as 1:2022cv00463
Plaintiff:
Edwin Gurule
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Cooper Tire & Rubber Company
Cross Claimant:
Edward Arnold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Epstein v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04242
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Arnold Epstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDowell et al v. Tireco, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00330
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Tireco, Inc. and Shandong Guofeng Rubber & Plastic Co., LTD
Plaintiff:
Linda McDowell and Arnold McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POWELL v. SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.
as 1:2019cv19114
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE POWELL, RYAN HICKS, DANIEL BINKLEY and others
Defendant:
SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARNOLD v. GENERAL MOTORS LLC
as 2:2019cv00212
Plaintiff:
Mr. JOHN ARNOLD and JOHN ARNOLD
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2017cv07441
Plaintiff:
Lori Allen , Clifton Arnold , Marya Ayers and others
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 4:2015cv00659
Plaintiff:
Michelle Smith , Ashley Arnold and Katlyn Dingman
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kessenger v. General Motors LLC
as 1:2015cv00977
Plaintiff:
Arnold Kessenger
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garza et al v. Chrysler Group LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00460
Plaintiff:
Norma Jean Garza , Adriana Nino , Elma Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
Chrysler Group LLC , Tino's Auto Mart and Florentino Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
