Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Markin et al v. Autozone Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00133
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Markin and Rhonda Markin
Defendant:
Autozone Stores LLC and Autozone Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sequiche v. Autozone Stores, LLC
as 6:2018cv00260
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Sequiche
Defendant:
Autozone, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Waxpros, Inc.
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Autozone Stores, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Simpson v. AutoZone Inc.
as 2:2018cv02512
Undetermined:
Jimmy Moore
Plaintiff:
Frank Simpson
Defendant:
AutoZone Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franco v. Autozone Inc et al
as 4:2017cv01787
Defendant:
Autozone Inc , AutoZoners LLC , AutoZone Parts, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Cindy Franco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Rogers v. Autozone, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00022
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Rogers
Defendant:
Autozone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Sojourner v. Autozone Inc et al
as 2:2016cv03735
Plaintiff:
Victoria Sojourner
Defendant:
Autozone Inc and CPTPNGUIN LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Symms v. Autozone Stores, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv15822
Plaintiff:
Michael Symms
Defendant:
Autozone Stores, LLC , Autozoners, LLC , Autozone Development, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. AutoZone Development Corporation, et al.
as 1:2015cv07308
Defendant:
AutoZone Development Corporation, Autozone Stores, Inc. and Autozone, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary L Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Davis v. AutoZone Development Corporation, et al.
as 1:2015cv09495
Petitioner:
Mary L Davis
Respondent:
AutoZone Development Corporation , Autozone, Inc. and Autozone Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burke et al v. Autozone, Inc.
as 2:2015cv03840
Defendant:
Autozone, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brian Burke and Lisa Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
