Cases 11 - 20 of 21
TSEMBERLIS v. ALVAREZ et al
as 2:2014cv07598
Plaintiff:
NICK TSEMBERLIS
Defendant:
GARRY ALVAREZ , UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and GEICO INSURANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GEICO Insurance Co. v. Larma
as 1:2014cv07990
Plaintiff:
GEICO Insurance Co.
Defendant:
Nicholas C. Larma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kenneth Steeprow v. Michael Penford, et al
as 14-14241
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH G. STEEPROW
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL R. PENFORD, GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY and HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY (THE)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Steeprow v. Penford et al
as 6:2014cv01204
Plaintiff:
Kenneth G. Steeprow
Defendant:
Michael R. Penford , GEICO Insurance Company and Hartford Insurance Company
Counter_claimant:
Michael R. Penfold
Counter_defendant:
Kenneth G. Steeprow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ARMSTRONG v. GEICO INSURANCE
as 2:2012cv05639
Plaintiff:
ARCHIE G. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
GEICO INSURANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mamot v. Geico Insurance Co. et al
as 1:2012cv06616
Plaintiff:
Patricio R. Mamot
Defendant:
Geico Insurance Co., Charles I. Ames and Shelton Noel-Makiko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fiechtner v. Geico Insurance
as 9:2011cv00006
Plaintiff:
Charles Adam Fiechtner, Sr
Defendant:
Geico Insurance, Officer Vance and Casandra Alford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
Jones v. GEICO General Insurance Company et al
as 5:2010cv00425
Plaintiff:
Tondala C Jones
Defendant:
GEICO General Insurance Company , GEICO Indemnity Company , GEICO Insurance Agency Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conklin v. Jordan et al
as 4:2010cv00080
Plaintiff:
Danny Lewis Conklin
Defendant:
Jerry Lynn Jordan and Geico Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
