Cases 21 - 30 of 86
BAUGN v. FOLEY CELLULOSE LLC
as 4:2018cv00486
Plaintiff:
RONNIE BAUGN
Defendant:
FOLEY CELLULOSE LLC and GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baughn v. Georgia Pacific Corporation
as 2:2017cv01341
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Baughn
Defendant:
Georgia Pacific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wyatt v. Georgia-Pacific LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00285
Plaintiff:
Justin Wyatt
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific LLC , Georgia-Pacific Brewton LLC and Georgia-Pacific Bleached Board LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sashington v. Georgia-Pacific LLC
as 2:2017cv00557
Plaintiff:
Antwoan Lynotus Sashington
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ballard et al v. Ameron International Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv06074
Plaintiff:
John Ballard and Suzanne Ballard
Defendant:
Ameron International Corporation , 3M Company, Allied Packing & Supply, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Woods v. Georgia-Pacific LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01075
Plaintiff:
Shannon Woods
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific LLC, Georgia-Pacific Bleach Board Hopper Paper Company and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shields v. Georgia-Pacific LLC
as 2:2016cv00263
Plaintiff:
Billy Shields
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leloff v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv00539
Defendant:
Georgia Pacific LLC, Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products, LP and Georgia-Pacific Corporation
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Leloff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Waltman v. Georgia-Pacific
as 16-8000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD WALTMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGIA-PACIFIC, LLC
Hafliger v. Georgia Pacific Consumer Products (Camas) LLC et al
as 3:2015cv05807
Plaintiff:
Raymond Hafliger
Defendant:
Georgia Pacific Consumer Products (Camas) LLC , John Does A-X and Doe Corporations A-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
