Cases 21 - 30 of 42
TURPITT v. RIVERBANK HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2014at00286
Plaintiff:
SHARON TURPITT
Defendant:
RIVERBANK HOUSING AUTHORITY, U.S. Postal Service and DARYL A TRUJILLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Shannon v. USPS et al
as 3:2014cv00337
Plaintiff:
Bruce Shannon
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service, Methodist Hospital and STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Medwed v. U.S. Postal Service
as 2:2012cv13792
Plaintiff:
Steven Medwed
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Scott et al v. U.S. Postal Service
as 5:2012cv12804
Plaintiff:
Leandra Scott and Charles Scott
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
William Hogan v. John Potter, et al
as 12-11694
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HOGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN E. POTTER, POSTMASTER GENERAL, U.S. POSTAL SERVICE and U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
LAWTON et al v. DZURISIN et al
as 3:2012cv00775
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY LAWTON and CARYN LAWTON
Defendant:
ANDREW DZURISIN, U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Rose v. United States of America et al
as 9:2010cv00143
Plaintiff:
Sandra M. Rose
Defendant:
United States of America and U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Fucile et al
as 3:2009cv01962
Plaintiff:
Michael Fucile, Angela E. Nelson and United States of America (U.S. Postal Service)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Cooperativa de Seguros Multipl, et al v. US, et al
as 09-2244
Plaintiff:
ANGEL PALMER-FERRER, MIRTA MARRERO-PALMER, JOSE ANGEL PALMER-MARRERO and others
Defendant - Appellant:
COOPERATIVA DE SEGUROS MULTIPLES
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES
Gay v. Cable Shopping Network et al
as 3:2009cv01016
Plaintiff:
L.C. Gay
Defendant:
Cable Shopping Network, Discover Card Services and U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
