Cases 71 - 80 of 146
Thompson v. PF Chang's China Bistro, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00186
Plaintiff:
Siobhan Thompson
Defendant:
P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bialon v. P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc.
as 0:2018cv00130
Plaintiff:
Eileen Bialon
Defendant:
P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bernardo Mendia v. John Garcia, et al
as 17-16483
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BERNARDO MENDIA
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN M. GARCIA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and CHING CHANG
Ahn et al v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv00133
Plaintiff:
Chang Ahn, Aeja Kim, Mi Won Kim and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
ZHANG v. FRIENDS OF THE NATIONAL ZOO et al
as 1:2016cv02423
Plaintiff:
WENCI CHANG ZHANG
Defendant:
FRIENDS OF THE NATIONAL ZOO and SMITHSONIAN'S NATIONAL ZOO AND CONSERVATION BIOLOGICAL INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Norde' et al v. P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc.
as 2:2016cv13595
Plaintiff:
Careea Norde' and Cecil Norde'
Defendant:
P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Overton v. Valvoline Instant Oil Change Franchising, Inc., et al
as 7:2016cv06474
Plaintiff:
Andrew Overton
Defendant:
Valvoline Instant Oil Change Franchising, Inc., , Roaring Brook, LLC and Galena Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Che v. Chang et al
as 8:2016cv02665
Plaintiff:
Li Che
Defendant:
Hsien Cheng Chang and Wasserman, Mancini & Chang, PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marchi v. P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00547
Plaintiff:
Michael Marchi
Defendant:
P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc. and Unknown Employee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thiel v. P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00124
Plaintiff:
Lynn M Thiel
Defendant:
P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
