Cases 1 - 10 of 387
SANCHEZ DIAZ v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 1:2024cv22011
Plaintiff:
MARINELA SANCHEZ DIAZ
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
DIAZ v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 1:2024cv22008
Plaintiff:
MARINELA SANCHEZ DIAZ
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Petersen et al v. Diaz et al
as 2:2024cv01151
Plaintiff:
Rodney Petersen, Jr. and Bobbie Petersen
Defendant:
Nathan Diaz, John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Diaz v. Schindler Elevator Corp.
as 7:2024cv02831
Plaintiff:
Beatriz Diaz
Defendant:
Schindler Elevator Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Anderson-Diaz v. Nordstrom, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
Comeka Anderson-Diaz
Defendant:
Nordstrom, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Diaz-Santiago v. Sanchez-Acosta, et al
as 24-1256
Plaintiff:
RAY LEONERDIRT DIAZ-SANTIAGO and RAY LEONERDIRT DIAZ, II
Defendant:
JOSE SANCHEZ-ACOSTA, Attorney and MANUEL CIDRE-MIRANDA
Diaz v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Amy N. Diaz
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Diaz-Santiago v. Sanchez-Acosta et al
as 3:2024cv01011
Plaintiff:
Ray Leonerdirt Diaz-Santiago
Defendant:
Jose Sanchez-Acosta and Manuel Cidre-Miranda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tuncay et al v. Ten Marketing Group, Corp. et al
as 3:2023cv01628
Plaintiff:
Ismail Tuncay, Arelyn Diaz and OTD
Defendant:
Ten Marketing Group, Corp., Multinational Insurance Company, John and Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wong et al v. MLB Advanced Media, L.P.
as 3:2024cv00779
Plaintiff:
Eric Wong, Teri Smith, Christopher Fletcher and others
Defendant:
MLB Advanced Media, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
